“Foreign espionage” sounds more like a Tom Cruise movie than a research concern, but the National Institute of Health (NIH) has gotten increasingly worried about it over the past year—specifically, in the biomedical research field. The NIH has taken significant steps to prevent other countries from stealing U.S. research, including investigating more than 55 research institutions for undisclosed ties to foreign organizations.
As a result, conflict of interest disclosure is more vital than ever. Keep reading to find out the risks of nondisclosure, potential conflicts of interest, and what the disclosure process entails.
“With the increased federal scrutiny regarding foreign influence on U.S. research, ensuring that all persons involved in research disclose outside interests has never been more important,” says Susan Wyatt Sedwick of Attain LLC. But federal scrutiny isn’t the only reason to disclose. Here are several others:
Compliance: Researchers have to demonstrate that they adhere to applicable state and federal regulations that were designed to protect intellectual integrity and accuracy, similar to IRB, IBC, and IACUC compliance.
Credibility is at stake: Research should be as objective as possible, not only to uphold high ethical standards, but to maintain public trust. The reputation of the researcher and institution could be irreparably ruined through a public relations fiasco.
Fines or loss of funding: Failure to disclose can result in fines from thousands to millions of dollars, and grants can be suspended.
Loss of employment: Researchers who fail to disclose could be fired or forced to resign, and the conditions of which could make finding a new position difficult.
Criminal charges: In Alabama and Colorado, it’s a misdemeanor to fail to disclose a conflict of interest. In Wyoming, you can go to prison for up to six months!
Inability to publish: Researchers found to be in noncompliance may be barred from submitting work to research journals for a period of time.
Investigation: Federal agencies employ inspectors to conduct investigations if there are reports of research misconduct or noncompliance. Agency investigation is an unpleasant experience akin to being audited.
Not exactly sure what constitutes a conflict of interest? Let’s break it down.
You can’t be a judge and a contestant on Dancing with the Stars. That’s a pretty obvious conflict of interest. The same concept applies in research, but it gets tricky because most situations aren’t that simple.
According to the University of California, San Francisco , a conflict of interest is “a situation in which financial or other personal considerations may compromise, or have the appearance of compromising a researcher’s professional judgment in conducting or reporting research.” It can exist in any type of research, whether it involves humans, animals, chemicals, soil, and so forth.
It’s important to note that everyone has financial and personal relationships outside of work, and those relationships aren’t necessarily bad or influence the outcomes of a study. In research, however, they need to be reported and evaluated to determine whether they constitute a conflict of interest (COI). “The existence of a conflict of interest does not imply any wrong-doing,” explains Brown University . “Conflicts of interest are not in and of themselves unethical or impermissible. Indeed, they are often unavoidable, and in many cases can be appropriately managed or reduced to an acceptable level.”
If an outside interest isn’t disclosed, it could bias research results or how they are reported—for example, minimizing certain results and emphasizing others. It might not even affect research, but it could give the appearance of bias, which may be enough for a conflict of interest. If you’re judging Dancing with the Stars and one of the contestants is your spouse’s cousin’s neighbor, it could look like you’re biased, even if you didn’t actually know the relationship existed!
The most obvious type of conflict of interest is financial. If you’re a principal investigator and a doughnut company gives you $20,000 to study the health benefits of doughnuts, the results will be scrutinized and suspected of bias. The scrutiny is warranted: A report found that when food companies sponsor research, it’s much more likely for study findings to be positive than when independent entities fund the research. Or if someone on your research team owns stock in a pharmaceutical company and then studies the effectiveness of its medication, the study will face similar skepticism.
Financial conflicts of interest (FCOI) may be the most well-known types, but non-financial conflicts of interest must be accounted for as well. Researcher and rheumatologist Dr. Paul Romain argues that non-financial outside interests may affect researchers’ professional judgment even more than financial interests—for example, wanting to replicate a colleague’s previous research findings, or validating someone’s political beliefs.
A relationship could be a conflict of interest if:
The goal is not to eliminate these relationships, but to be transparent and forthcoming about them so that a third-party review can determine whether it’s a conflict of interest and if it can be managed.
Different institutions have different rules for COI disclosures. Some mandate that only researchers need to disclose interests, while others require all faculty and staff to complete conflict of interest disclosures. Check the policies and procedures at your institution so you know whether you need to participate.
Many research organizations have an annual disclosure process, with the stipulation that if a researcher’s relationship with an external organization changes, s/he must disclose it within 30 days. Some institutions require research-based disclosures which must be submitted for each new grant proposal or project. In any case, individuals must disclose interests before a study begins.
Disclosing outside interests entails filling out a form with various types of relationships (stock, gifts, travel, etc.), checking off any that apply to the researcher and his or her family members, and specifying the details of any relationships that do apply (e.g., dollar value of speaking fees received in the past 12 months, if it’s over $5,000).
After a COI disclosure is submitted, it is reviewed by a group such as the COI Office, Office of Research Integrity, Compliance Office, Office of Sponsored Programs, etc. If there is nothing to disclose, or a relationship does not constitute a conflict of interest, it is called a “negative disclosure.” The vast majority of researchers have nothing to disclose!
If the researcher does have qualifying outside interests to disclose, reviewers determine whether it’s a conflict of interest. They consider the size, nature, and duration of the relationship, among other factors, as well as how the public may perceive it. If necessary, reviewers request more information about the relationship.
If reviewers determine an outside interest is a COI, then it’s called a “positive disclosure,” and they decide whether or not it can be managed so the research may proceed. One study found that of financial relationships disclosed, only 1 in 4 constituted a conflict of interest that needed to be managed. Managing an outside interest could entail reducing or eliminating the relationship, disclosing it to study participants and the public, changing the researcher’s role on the project, or changing aspects of the research. In rare cases, the compliance group might say the COI is unmanageable and that the research cannot proceed.
Disclosing may sound fairly straightforward, but it’s quite time-consuming if the process is paper-based, with many spreadsheets needing to be manually updated and physical files stored in cabinets. As a result, researchers are often reluctant to participate. Reviewing the disclosures is cumbersome and involves multiple processes managed by different departments. Reporting on disclosure submission and status is also tedious, with low data integrity.
And yet disclosure is absolutely necessary. It may be a hassle, but it is certainly preferable to the consequences. With so much at stake, the conflict of interest process is vital to ensure the future of research integrity and public regard for science.
Interested in simplifying the conflict of interest disclosure and review process? Learn how Outside Interests can make disclosures painless .
